Where the seller’s real estate broker failed to inform the seller that the next door neighbor had disclosed to the broker plans to build on the neighboring property, and therefore obstruct the seller’s Pacific Ocean view, and where after the sale, the buyer moved to rescind the transaction based on the loss of the ocean view, the Court of Appeal ruled that there was a question of fact regarding the broker’s failure to disclose the neighbor’s intent to build. There was a question of fact as to whether the broker breached his fiduciary duty to the seller. Summary judgment for the broker was reversed. Ryan v. Real Estate of the Pacific (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 637, California Court of Appeal.
Subscribe

Hearthstone Legal Group Newsletter
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
You have Successfully Subscribed!
Recent Posts
THE ZOMBIE MORTGAGE APOCALYPSE, PT. IBy Hearthstone Legal GroupIn creditors, mortageJuly 14, 2026After 9/11, President Bush encouraged Americans to go […]
The (Car) Accidental Debtor/PlaintiffBy Hearthstone Legal GroupIn bankruptcy, BANKRUPTCY LAWJune 9, 2026According to the glossary maintained by the […]
The Debtor PrecedentBy Hearthstone Legal GroupIn creditors, Fair Credit Reporting ActMay 26, 2026A very important legal principle is, “If […]

